
Tribal Perspective:
Transcripts
Darrell Kipp (Pikuni-Blackfeet)
Debate Between The Written And Oral Word
I believe the official debate in America is the debate between the written
word, the recorded word, and the oral tradition of native Americans,
and as academically, anyone who has gone through a formal education
system for any length of time we put this heavy emphasis on the written
word, in other word it has to be on paper, it has to be in a book or
it isn't true, and consequently if its in a book and its written we
will believe utter nonsense, we will believe a total lie, we will accept
anything under the guise that its written it must be true, and consequently
when we come to oral traditions of tribes the normal academic formal
educated American is always suspicious, oh these are myths, these are
legends, these are fairly tales, and i think native Americans are put
off by how these stories attributed to them, i call them their origin
stories, to be called a myth, or a legend or a fairytale, or put in
a category of a made up story, and consequently without finding in the
last five years this terrific parallel as archeology finally begins
to embrace the oral tradition of tribes … And once they begin
to see that this world, this campsite, is connected to this large landscape
of human life out there for thousands of years, then they start putting
some meaning into these small artifacts. They say, “Oh I see,
this is part of the oral tradition.’ And you can go into tribal
oral tradition and you can extract stories and other factual material
that coincide precisely with the archaeological record, and yet we have
no problem accepting the archaeological record but we do have a problem
with the oral tradition, that is changing today, and i believe that
within twenty years we will see a great deal of information revealed
because of this close connection between science and oral tradition
of natives, native Americans.
Lewis Malatare (Umatilla)
Let Us Tell Our Own Story
Allow us to give the history of our people the way we want it to be
told. Not the way that it was written in the books. Not the way it’s
portrayed in newspapers of the past, magazines and other media. We needed
to be able to show the people who we really were, are, what we are going
to be tomorrow.
Cecilia Bearchum
(Walla Walla-Umatilla)
How Oral History Is Really Done
You know how oral history is really done, years ago, what they would
do is if there were several of them that experienced the same thing,
whatever happened, a fight, or whatever, they would all sit down and
each person would tell their version of what happened. And then the
next person would do the same thing, and they'd go clear around, and
then all of them would put it together the way they thought it actually
happened. And that was oral history.
Allen
Pinkham (Nez Perce)
Indian People Have Never Had Voices
There are a lot of myths, there are misunderstandings, misconceptions
about Indian people. We need to clarify what we are and who we are in
our terms. Indian people have never had voices in interpretation of
the expansion of the Northwest, simply because we were never considered
experts.
Julie Cajune (Salish)
A Different Look at American History
And to a lot of people in America it's really disconcerting to �look
at American history in a very different way. And I know that it's
unsettling because we like to believe that people are good, we want to
believe that our leaders are good, we want to believe that their
intensions are good, and we want to feel good about that, but we can't
always look at history and feel good. But I think it's really
important for America to become honest about that, �we need to rethink
how we relate to other people and how we treat other people, and being
honest and being honest about that in telling our story. I think
that's important for America to come of age, in that way. So, I think
that this is one way that we can start to do that, by telling the
truth about how this country evolved, about how this country came to
be, and who paid the cost.